Project Planning

Planning an eDiscovery project is an iterative process that overlaps and intersects with other early project activities, but investing the time and effort required for effective planning will produce downstream benefits including saved time and money, reduced risk, and increased defensibility. Checklists are invaluable tools for ensuring consistency and completeness in your efforts. Below are a few model checklists you can customize for your organization:

  • Initial Scoping Checklist
    • What are the events at issue, and what are the legal claims?
    • What internal and external individuals should be involved in brainstorming?
    • What questions do we have about the underlying events?  What questions will they have?
    • What materials might answer those questions for us and/or for them?
    • What are the elements of the relevant legal claims and defenses?
  • Surveying Checklist
    • Do we need additional information from many potential custodians?
    • Would self-reported answers be sufficient for our current purposes?
    • Given the questions and recipients, what format makes the most sense?
    • How will answers be collected, aggregated, and made useful for planning?
    • How will completion tracking, reminder issuance, and follow-ups be done?
  • Sampling Checklist
    • Do we need additional information about what’s on various sources or systems?
    • Do we need support for discovery negotiations as well as our own project planning?
    • Would judgmental sampling of one or more of the devices be sufficient?
    • Is formal statistical sampling needed to take more specific measurements?
    • How will the sampling process, including decisions and rationales, be documented?
    • What materials might establish or refute each of them?
    • What individuals, devices, departments, or systems might contain them?
    • What distinctive characteristics might help you search or filter for them?
    • What is the relative priority of each potential source identified?
    • What grouping into tiers should be applied for planning subsequent steps?
  • Targeted Interview Checklist
    • Who is familiar with enterprise, departmental, and/or third party systems?
    • Who can provide details about employee computers, devices, and usage?
    • Who else might be able to confirm or deny assumptions about what’s there?
    • What details would you ideally like to know about the potentially relevant sources?
    • Has everything from your prioritized list been reviewed, detailed, and documented?
  • Data Mapping Checklist
    • What kinds of hypothetical systems and devices are implicated by your list?
    • What details about those systems would it be most useful for you to know?
    • From where and whom within the organization could those details be gathered?
    • Have all relevant (and reasonably obtainable) source details been gathered?
    • Are those details consistently described in a manipulable spreadsheet or matrix?
  • Volume Estimation Checklist
    • How many of each kind of source do we have?
    • How large do we expect each individual source to be?
    • How broadly or narrowly do we plan to collect for this matter?
    • How much volume expansion do we anticipate during processing?
    • How much reduction from de-NISTing, deduplication, and objective filters?
  • Cost Estimation Checklist
    • What are our projected volumes before and after processing?
    • How much additional volume reduction do we expect after processing?
    • What review options and methods do we expect to employ in this matter?
    • How much privileged or technically-challenging material do we expect?
    • What price list, bundle, or model are we using for this matter?
  • Role and Communication Checklist
    • Who will function as each organization’s primary point of contact?
    • Who at each organization will have authority to make key decisions?
    • How and from whom can after-hours assistance be obtained?
    • What is the escalation path for each organization?
    • Who is the ultimate decision-maker for each organization?
    • What protective language or identifiers should be used in email?
    • Are there any limits on the recipients or topics for email?
    • What are the storage and retention rules for email?
    • What are the labeling, storage, and retention rules for non-email documentation?
    • What recurring documentation, if any, needs to be generated?

Read our in-depth posts below to learn how each checklist was created and why each piece is vital.

Learn more about our selection of eDiscovery services.

Key Project Scoping and Planning Takeaways Series, Part 7

One final piece of advice for effective eDiscovery project scoping and planning: seek help from experienced practitioners early and often.  It is quite common for organizations not to involve an eDiscovery service provider or independent expert in their eDiscovery project efforts until much of the initial scoping and planning has already been done – sometimes after the meet-and-confer has already occurred and an agreement has already been negotiated.  Unfortunately, at this point it’s already too late to avoid some of the pitfalls discussed in this series, and the negotiated agreement may not even be technically feasible. Read on to review the other key project scoping and planning takeaways from this series.

Read More

eDiscovery Project Roles and Communication Series, Part 6

As you transition from your planning and estimation activities into the full eDiscovery project, taking time to predefine key roles and communication guidelines can save significant time and confusion later.  Even a modestly-sized eDiscovery project is likely to involve individuals from the client organization or one or more law firms. Just as important as setting a plan in place for key roles and delegation of decision-making authority is establishing some rules or guidelines for how communication should be handled, including how it will flow, what rules should be followed for email, and what other documentation should be generated. Learn how to assign primary points of contact and delegate key authority as well as how to establish communication and documentation rules.

Read More

Volume Estimation and Downstream Planning Series, Part 5

Once you have completed your initial planning and completed your investigation activities to validate and flesh out your initial assumptions, you should be equipped with enough information to proceed to estimations of project volumes and potential costs. As with volume estimation, cost estimation is largely a matter of math, multiplying your projected volumes and counts by your preferred service provider’s price list (or bundle, etc.). Several of the calculators linked to within the post for data volume estimation can be used to help you estimate pricing as well, and many service providers also offer their own calculator built to reflect their specific pricing model. Read further to review the factors used in these calculations and to discover the types of calculators available.

Read More

Surveying and Sampling During eDiscovery Project Planning Series, Part 4

The investigative options you need to undertake to test your project assumptions will depend on the specifics of your project, especially on its scale.  Larger or more complex projects will require more – and more ambitious – investigative efforts.  Surveying and sampling are particularly useful and important in projects that feature a large number of potential custodians or other sources. Surveying in this context, like targeted interviews, is part and parcel of what would normally be your full, pre-collection custodian interview process. In the land of eDiscovery, “sampling” is used to refer to both judgmental and statistical sampling.  In this early project planning phase, both kinds of sampling can be useful. Learn more about the specific types of these methods and when each is the most beneficial.

Read More

Investigating Your eDiscovery Project Assumptions Series, Part 3

Once you have collaborated with knowledgeable individuals to brainstorm hypothetical materials and potential sources (and prioritize them), you are ready to begin investigating the facts on the ground to bridge the gap from your imagination to actual reality.  A variety of investigative options are available for accomplishing this, including: targeted interviewing; data mapping; surveying; and, sampling.  Which one (or more than one) will be most useful to you will depend on your circumstances – in particular, your expected number and types of sources.

Read More

Initial eDiscovery Project Scoping Steps Series, Part 2

Each new project is going to be fairly opaque to you at the outset.  You will know the general legal subject matter, the essential event(s) giving rise to the issue, and any individually named defendants within the organization.  Beyond that, however, anything and everything (or nothing) might be relevant. Starting with what you know about the type of matter, the underlying facts, and the key players (typically based on a complaint or preservation notice), you and your collaborators must extrapolate what types of relevant materials are likely to exist within the organization and where (or in whose custody) they are likely to be.  This should include consideration of both the information and materials you will want to see and use and the information and materials you anticipate the opposing party will request. Once you have finished your brainstorming exercise and have a list of potentially-extant relevant materials, likely places to look for them, and distinctive characteristics you might use to identify them, your next step is to prioritize these potential materials, sources, and custodians to guide your subsequent activities and allocation of resources.  Read more to learn the general flow of inquiry and the criteria on which to base prioritization.

Read More

Clichés, Chaos, and eDiscovery Project Planning Series, Part 1

eDiscovery is undeniably challenging.  Data volumes continue to multiply, data types continue to diversify, and data custodians continue to modify their tools and practices.  Couple this daunting set of variables with an ever-expanding set of eDiscovery tools and services available to be leveraged, add time-pressure and an adversarial process, and you have a perfect recipe for chaos, uncertainty, and small (but important) things getting missed. The reliable way to reduce the risk of such errors is to take the time for proper planning before rushing headlong to action.  To be sure, planning an eDiscovery project is an iterative process that overlaps and intersects with other early project activities, but investing the time and effort required for effective planning, from the beginning (and throughout those early phases), will produce downstream benefits including saved time, saved money, reduced risk, and increased defensibility. 

Read More

Because you need to know

Contact Us